I still feel lost towards the end of the book in the conclusion and I do wonder why he chose to make this excerpt the conclusion. I do understand when he mentions, "Assume for a moment that the criminal code applied to writers as well. We would be sued for negligence and the incompletion of characters...." I think he's trying to say people don't like how the writer limits a character in the book.
I feel like he left this last excerpt a cliff hanger like what happens next.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.